Thalia Nitz/College of Sydney
Thus far, little has been recognized about folks dwelling in north-western Saudi Arabia through the Neolithic – the interval historically outlined by the shift to people controlling meals manufacturing and settling into communities with agriculture and domesticated animals.
The piecemeal proof accessible hinted conventional concepts – of small struggling teams consistently on the transfer throughout the barren lands – wanted to be revisited.
Now, an Australian-led group has launched new analysis on monumental buildings we name “standing stone circles”. The findings are serving to to rewrite what we all know in regards to the individuals who lived on this land between 6,500 and eight,000 years in the past.
Our proof reveals what they ate, what instruments they used and even the jewelry they wore. It leads us to suppose these folks weren’t struggling a lot in any case, however quite had discovered advanced and strategic methods to thrive on the land for millennia.
The challenge
Over the previous 5 years, our group of researchers has studied 431 standing stone circles within the AlUla and Khaybar areas of north-west Saudi Arabia, as a part of an ongoing challenge sponsored by the Royal Fee for AlUla. Of the 431 constructions, 52 have been surveyed intimately and 11 excavated.
Our newest findings come from a number of buildings discovered on the Harrat ‘Uwayrid – a volcanic plateau fashioned over millennia. The dense clusters of standing stone circles on the harrat present us how advanced these cell pastoralist communities really had been. We additionally recovered remnants left behind by the individuals who lived in these buildings for greater than 1,000 years.

An aerial view of some standing stone circles.
RCU/College of Western Australia/College of Sydney.
We used a variety of contemporary and conventional strategies to deal with the sensible limitations of working in such a distant and rugged panorama. Aerial survey by helicopter helped us determine examples of the dwellings throughout 40,000 sq. kilometres of basalt and sandy desert. Drones had been additionally used to make plans of the websites, some nearly three hectares in measurement.
Greater than only a home
Our’s is the primary printed proof for home structure from this era. These buildings are substantial, between 4 and eight metres large. They’re fashioned by two concentric rows of huge stones positioned end-to-end in a circle.

The shelter foundations had been fashioned by huge basalt blocks weighing as much as a tonne every.
RCU/College of Western Australia/College of Sydney.
We theorise the area created between the 2 rows of stone acted as a basis for timber posts wedged between the rows to assist the dwelling’s roof. One other slab within the centre supported a central timber publish lashed to it.
Based mostly on the instruments and animal stays we’ve discovered, we predict the occupants in all probability threw animal skins throughout the highest of the construction to surround it, forming a roof of kinds.
These constructions – which we consider extra as shelters than “homes” – had been used for any and all actions. Inside, we discovered proof of stone tool-making, cooking and consuming, in addition to misplaced and damaged instruments used for processing animal hides.
A various palate
Our evaluation of the animal bones discovered contained in the constructions exhibits these folks largely ate domesticated species, reminiscent of goats, sheep and a smaller variety of cattle. They supplemented this with wild species reminiscent of gazelles and birds.
This implies they might reply to adjustments of their surroundings with flexibility – giving them resilience at a time when local weather change would have been affecting the supply of water and vegetation.
This adaptability additionally prolonged to their use of crops. They left behind many grindstones – slabs of basalt worn flat by the grinding of untamed grasses and native crops.

Grindstones and mullers had been used for crushing pigment and crops.
RCU/College of Western Australia/College of Sydney.
Nomadic or cell?
We assume these folks didn’t keep in a single place, since they lived in buildings that could possibly be partially dismantled and moved. Goats and sheep additionally want contemporary pastures and water to outlive.
That mentioned, these folks spent sufficient time at every website to justify the effort and time required to supply and manipulate basalt blocks weighing as much as one tonne every. This means they returned to those places repeatedly for lots of of years, if no more than 1,200 years.
They left behind supplies collected from close to and much. Whereas the native basalt was enough for on a regular basis instruments, the perfect supplies created from chert (a tricky sedimentary rock) had been introduced as much as the Harrat Uwayrid to make advantageous arrowheads, drills and scrapers.

A number of small chert artefacts together with arrowheads and a scraper.
RCU/College of Western Australia/College of Sydney.
Additionally they collected crimson stone to be crushed into pigment. It might have been used for rock artwork, or maybe for portray our bodies and hides.
Small shells had been introduced from the Crimson Sea (some 120 kilometres away) to make beads. Different objects we discovered included bracelets and pendants carved and polished from unique stone.

We discovered remnants of hanging ornaments and bracelets (proper).
RCU/College of Western Australia/College of Sydney.
Buying and selling within the Levant
It appears seemingly these folks fashioned a culturally distinct group who interacted with their neighbours within the Levant to the north, a area which incorporates modern-day Jordan, Palestine and Syria, amongst others.
Our findings counsel they imported their animals and stone instrument applied sciences. Among the instruments resemble these discovered at earlier websites throughout Jordan, which suggests they both traded or realized find out how to make them from additional north.
Domesticated goats and sheep would have additionally been sourced from additional afield, as there have been no wild variations of those animals within the space. All the pieces they introduced was integrated usefully into their lifestyle, to go well with the lands they already knew so nicely.
Our work is simply starting to fill within the gaps of what life was like in north-western Arabia, serving to reintroduce it – and its folks – into the image of the broader area.

Jane McMahon receives funding from the Royal Fee for AlUla. She works for the College of Sydney, and is an honorary analysis fellow on the College of Western Australia.












