Elon Musk’s US$44 billion provide to purchase Twitter and switch the social media platform into a non-public firm is sort of a executed deal.
However not fairly. Whereas Twitter’s board has endorsed his provide, Musk now wants the nod from a majority of Twitter’s shareholders and US company regulators.
Earlier than we get on to the small print of those remaining hurdles, let’s recap the tumultuous occasions that received us thus far.
It turned public in early April that Musk – an avid Twitter consumer – had acquired 9.2% of the corporate’s shares, making him the largest shareholder. There have been talks about him becoming a member of Twitter’s board, however Musk demurred.
A few week later, on April 14, Musk launched a full takeover bid, providing US$54.20 a share – about 38% greater than the corporate’s share value on April 1.
Twitter’s board responded with a “poison capsule” provision. This may enable different shareholders to purchase new shares issued by the board at a reduction if Musk acquired a 15% stake (greater than 15% is taken into account a controlling stake). This may have diluted Musk’s stake, thwarting his takeover ambitions.
Do poison capsules work? A finance professional explains the anti-takeover device that Twitter hopes will preserve Elon Musk at bay
Musk responded to that by flagging a hostile takeover. This concerned bypassing the board with a “tender provide” direct to shareholders, asking them to tender their shares on the market regardless of the board’s opposition.
With no competing bidder, and with no different plan to create worth for shareholders, Twitter’s board this week lastly accepted Musk’s bid of US$54.20 a share in money.
Musk plans to finance the bid utilizing fairness and debt, in response to his filings with the US Securities and Trade Fee. He has secured about US$25.5 billion in loans. He has additionally raised his personal fairness, totalling round $21 billion, together with via margin loans towards Tesla inventory.
How may regulators react?
The acquisition nonetheless requires regulatory and shareholder approval. Whereas these are unlikely to sink the deal, they don’t seem to be trivial.
There are two major regulatory approvals right here. First the Securities and Trade Fee – which is akin to a monetary watchdog – should approve the takeover. Then the Federal Commerce Fee and Division of Justice will take into account if the takeover might scale back competitors.
Musk has had destructive interactions with the SEC prior to now. In 2018 it charged him with fraud over him tweeting he had funding to take his electrical automobile firm Tesla non-public. Musk in the end settled, paying a US$20 million positive and stepping down as chair of the Tesla board. Some shareholders are suing him for losses suffered on account of his tweet.
Musk’s conduct throughout his bid for Twitter might additionally affect regulators. There are questions on whether or not he disclosed his 9.2% holding in a well timed sufficient method. Ordinarily a shareholder ought to disclose their stake as soon as they personal 5% of an organization. Musk seems to have acquired greater than 5% of Twitter on March 11 2022 however filed with regulators on 4 April.
Additional, Musk seems to have made a “brief kind” submitting with the SEC, reserved for passive shareholders. His subsequent behaviour, nevertheless, suggests he’s an activist investor.
Given Musk’s disclosure file, the SEC is prone to be be particularly cautious to make sure Twitter’s shareholders are correctly knowledgeable. If it finds Musk violated any legal guidelines, it might impose penalties or require undertakings masking Musk’s function with Twitter after the acquisition. It’s, nevertheless, unlikely to cease the deal.
The opposite US anti-trust and competitors regulators are additionally prone to scrutinise the bid, given its excessive profile and bipartisan issues concerning the energy of Large Tech.
However it is usually unlikely they might block Musk’s bid, as a result of he has little different monetary curiosity in tech firms to obviously counsel his takeover is anti-competitive.
How will different shareholders reply?
Shareholders should approve the deal through a shareholder vote, which is but to be scheduled. If a majority approve the bid, then all shareholders should promote.
In making their vote, some shareholders may take into account non-financial issues, akin to their view of Musk and what – if something – the acquisition means without cost speech.
Twitter: not even Elon Musk is rich sufficient to carry absolute free speech to the platform – this is why
However for many value is the important thing.
Some shareholders have complained that Musk’s $54.20 bid is just too low. Twitter briefly traded above US$70 in July 2021 – in step with the rise of tech shares typically in 2021, nevertheless it fell steadily thereafter to US$32.42. In February 2022, Goldman Sachs valued Twitter shares US$30 over the subsequent 12 months based mostly on its most up-to-date earnings.
Twitter’s share value
Twitter’s earnings have been variable and face continued stress. Whereas revenues have elevated, Twitter just isn’t worthwhile, owing partly to a litigation cost.
Different tech companies have signalled continued stress to promoting income. For instance, Google’s mother or father firm, Alphabet, reported a decline in YouTube advert income within the first quarter of 2022, relative to the tip of 2021.
These details ought to affect how most shareholders vote. Musk’s US$54.20 bid value presents a strong takeover premium: 18% above the value earlier than the takeover bid, 38% above the value on April 1, and about 50% above the value earlier than Musk accrued shares on January 31 2022. That is on the higher finish of takeover premiums reported by Boston Consulting Group.
So what now
So Musk could be very prone to full the acquisition for Twitter. Regulators might impose situations however are unlikely to dam the deal.
The massive questions now are how Musk will allow “free speech” with out turning Twitter right into a cesspool, how he’ll take care of censorious international locations wherein his different firms (Tesla, SpaceX, Starlink and others) do enterprise, and if he’ll earn money from Twitter.
However these complications will probably be Musk’s alone, not the previous shareholders.
Mark Humphery-Jenner doesn’t work for, seek the advice of, personal shares in or obtain funding from any firm or organisation that will profit from this text, and has disclosed no related affiliations past their educational appointment.