If you happen to had been to imagine the Morrison authorities, you’d assume Anthony Albanese as prime minister would promote out Australia’s pursuits to China, give criminals a break, and maybe sneak in a demise tax.
You’d query whether or not this man, who held senior positions within the Labor years, together with briefly being deputy PM, might run a reliable authorities. As a result of, you see, he didn’t have an financial or nationwide safety portfolio.
Scott Morrison is set to do what Malcolm Turnbull refused to do within the 2016 election – run a ferocious, no-holds-barred destructive marketing campaign to attempt to trash his opponent.
The difficulty with being a small goal, which has been Albanese’s technique all this time period however particularly lately, is that your opponent will nonetheless search to show you into an enormous goal, certainly a scary threat to the nation.
The federal government’s marketing campaign over the previous fortnight’s parliamentary sitting has been stuffed with gross exaggeration and, on the difficulty of coverage on China, it has been outrageous and irresponsible. It’s a mark of Morrison’s desperation, and it carries dangers of backfiring.
The query stays, nevertheless, whether or not the assault shall be efficient. Or will the federal government simply hurt itself by going excessive?
We’ve seen many scare campaigns by means of the years which have had little regard for the reality. Labor’s “Mediscare” claims in 2016 about an alleged Coalition menace to Medicare was potent, regardless of missing substance. However the Morrison authorities’s effort is among the many most brazen.
With out a compelling constructive agenda of its personal, the federal government believes – or hopes – that Albanese, who continues to be not effectively outlined within the public’s thoughts, is doubtlessly a mushy goal within the two key coverage areas the place the Coalition often has a bonus – nationwide safety and economics.
It has gambled that in our fast-moving media cycle it may get away with extraordinary claims, helped by sections of the media.
However in its nationwide safety assault on Labor, the federal government this week bumped into some heavy counter fireplace it could not have anticipated, from impeccable sources. The present and a former chief of ASIO weighed in in opposition to the Coalition’s crude try and wedge Labor over China.
The saga began when Defence Minister Peter Dutton declared final week that “the Chinese language Communist Get together, the Chinese language authorities” had picked Albanese as “their candidate” within the coming election.
Dutton led along with his chin, saying he was reflecting on what had been reported and commented on by the ASIO director-general, Mike Burgess.
Burgess, in his “Annual Menace Evaluation” speech the earlier night, had stated ASIO lately disrupted “a overseas interference plot within the lead-up to an election in Australia”. He didn’t title the nation or the jurisdiction. Burgess associated how a rich “puppeteer” had employed an worker to establish potential goal candidates.
This week Morrison dipped again into the China effectively.
On Wednesday, he informed parliament the Chinese language authorities “have picked their horse” (Albanese) and labelled Labor’s deputy chief, Richard Marles, a “Manchurian candidate” for remarks Marles made some years in the past. (“Manchurian candidate” is a reference from a political thriller to somebody brainwashed and manipulated by an enemy energy.)
The stakes had been raised for the federal government when, in a uncommon TV look on Wednesday night time, Burgess made it clear he was lower than impressed with ASIO, which was “apolitical”, being drawn into political infighting.
Then on Thursday the federal government acquired a large whack from Dennis Richardson, who is just not solely a former ASIO head but additionally a former secretary of the defence and overseas affairs departments and was Australia’s ambassador in Washington.
Richardson denounced the federal government’s “try and create a synthetic division the place one in observe doesn’t exist”, saying that solely served “the pursuits of 1 nation. And that’s China.”
Learn extra:
Elections are hardly ever determined by safety and defence points, however China might make 2022 totally different
He described the tactic as “grubby past perception”.
Morrison was not postpone, later that day saying Albanese “is the Chinese language authorities’s decide at this election”.
The federal government’s sledges in opposition to Albanese on the financial and law-and-order fronts had been much less spectacular however equally stretched.
Treasurer Josh Frydenberg final week delved into the archives, again to when Albanese, as a Labor Get together official from the left within the early Nineteen Nineties, moved a movement at a convention calling for consideration of an inheritance tax. From this, Frydenberg asserted, “he stands for demise duties”.
In selling laws to make it simpler to deport visa holders convicted of significant crimes, Morrison accused Albanese of being “clearly on the aspect of criminals”.
In defensive ways, Albanese has been extraordinarily surefooted.
Thus, after Burgess’s revelation about overseas interference, the opposition chief instantly contacted him and was in a position to report that ASIO has no drawback with any of Labor’s federal candidates.
As Morrison attacked Labor’s credentials on nationwide safety, Albanese tabled a letter from the PM final yr thanking him for supporting the federal government on the AUKUS settlement.
Albanese met the “scare” round his one-time backing for an inheritance tax three a long time in the past with ridicule, waving round an economics essay he’d written 4 a long time in the past.
Efforts by the federal government to wedge Labor on the visa laws and laws on weapons fell in a heap. The opposition waved the payments by means of the Home of Representatives with little prospect of them being thought-about within the Senate earlier than the election.
The federal government’s effort final week to wedge Labor on the non secular discrimination laws ended with it being wedged by its personal insurgent backbenchers.
Albanese has coated off each angle that’s come up.
As an illustration, on Thursday he informed parliament in a private rationalization that he had consulted Burgess earlier than attending the opening of the Chau Chak Wing Museum at Sydney College in 2020. He added that he had obtained Burgess’s permission to say this to parliament.
Earlier this week a Labor senator named, below parliamentary privilege, businessman and political donor Chau because the “puppeteer” referred to within the Burgess speech, one thing Burgess declined to be drawn on.
In his assertion to parliament, Albanese stated he did “frequently seek the advice of with our nationwide safety companies, as a result of I take their position critically as chief of the opposition”.
Nonetheless neat Albanese’s strikes, nevertheless reprehensible the federal government’s, Labor doesn’t idiot itself. Morrison and his ministers have sown the seeds for a nationwide safety scare, and it’s too early to know whether or not they may germinate.
What we do know is that the Chinese language authorities should be having fun with this spectacle immensely.
Michelle Grattan doesn’t work for, seek the advice of, personal shares in or obtain funding from any firm or organisation that might profit from this text, and has disclosed no related affiliations past their tutorial appointment.
