Shutterstock AI
On Saturday, X (previously Twitter) chairman Elon Musk tweeted he can be eradicating the microblogging platform’s block perform. It will stay intact for direct messages, however would in any other case develop into out of date.
That is the most recent in a sequence of controversial and infrequently complicated strikes from Musk since he took possession of the platform in October 2022. Why does Musk need to block the block perform? And what may the results be for customers, and certainly the way forward for the platform?
Why block the ‘block’?
Merely, the block perform on X prevents one consumer from interacting with one other. With the clicking of a button, the blocker can deny one other consumer the power to learn their tweets or reshare their content material.
Musk’s dislike of this characteristic isn’t new. In June he remarked that “blocking public posts is mindless”. He has additionally condemned campaigns amongst customers to dam subscribers paying for a Twitter Blue subscription (which grants them perks resembling a blue tick beside their identify and the power to edit posts).
Musk’s newest pronouncement is perhaps associated to his self-styled “free speech absolutist” persona. Final yr, after he introduced the deal to buy X (then Twitter), Musk remarked:
Free speech is the bedrock of a functioning democracy, and Twitter is the digital city sq. the place issues important to the way forward for humanity are debated.
Accordingly, Musk then restored accounts that had been banned for what earlier web site moderators categorised as harmful content material. These high-profile reinstatements included rapper Kanye West (eliminated for anti-Semitism), congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene (eliminated for spreading COVID misinformation) and right-wing persona Dominick McGee (who posted youngster abuse materials).
In June of this yr, Musk publicly stated “distasteful” content material – together with tweets celebrating a migrant boat accident within the Mediterranean Sea by which lives had been misplaced – may stay on-line so long as they weren’t unlawful.
In fact, “blocking” somebody on social media isn’t the identical as eradicating their account or deleting content material. Blocking shouldn’t be censorship as that is generally understood in a social media context; it doesn’t contain, say, eradicating customers or their content material from a platform, and even shadow-banning (whereby a platform reduces the visibility of sure posts amongst a lot of customers).
That stated, blocking does threaten the pugilistic mannequin of free speech Musk endorses. He has known as X the “participant versus participant” (a form of duelling mode in on-line video video games) of social media. The chance of skirmishes is lowered when “gamers” can block each other.
What would the results be?
Maybe blocking the “block” perform would permit full of life and heated (however not dangerous) debate to flourish on X. Or maybe not. As Adi Robertson writes in an article for The Verge:
Blocking gives some very tangible advantages, serving to customers (particularly high-profile ones) do something from avoiding harassment to easily cleansing up spam of their replies.
It could possibly additionally forestall publicity to hate speech, which has risen since Musk took possession. In accordance with the Centre for Countering Digital Hate, X “fails to behave on 99% of hate posted by Twitter Blue subscribers”. Musk has disputed the findings and filed a lawsuit in opposition to the group (an motion that sits uneasily alongside his free-speech absolutism).
The shortcoming to dam hate speech may assist normalise it and create a hostile setting for folks in teams which are usually focused, resembling girls, LGBTQ+ folks, Indigenous folks and migrants.
X has lengthy been labelled a “hellsite” on account of the toxicity that seems on the platform. In a post-block period, it’d develop into much more hellish.
What occurs past the block?
Musk has recommended “a stronger type of mute” may change the block perform. The mute perform at the moment permits customers to keep away from seeing the actions of sure different customers – however the muted particular person can nonetheless work together with the muter (resembling by commenting on their posts) in a method {that a} blocked particular person can’t.
What would “a stronger type of mute” appear like? Musk hasn’t stated. His plans to take away the block and implement this perform appear notably unclear when you think about he has already fired so lots of the firm’s staff, together with technical workers.
Additional, each the Apple Retailer and Google Play have pointers stipulating that platforms internet hosting user-generated content material should permit the blocking of different customers. Eradicating this capability may result in the app shops dropping X, which may spell financial dying for the platform.
Worded otherwise, Musk may reach “blocking” X from its customers completely. Or he might argue a stronger type of mute fulfils the identical necessities because the block perform. Both method, the indicators level to a powerful chance of X turning into a very nightmarish city sq..
Learn extra:
Why Elon Musk’s first week as Twitter proprietor has customers flocking elsewhere
Jay Daniel Thompson receives funding from the Australian Analysis Council for a collaborative examine entitled 'Addressing on-line hostility in Australian Digital Cultures' (DP230100870). Dr. Thompson can also be the recipient of a 2023 Herbert & Valmae Freilich Undertaking ECR Small Grant for a challenge entitled ‘Digital citizenship and moral journalistic representations of on-line hostility directed at girls and ladies’.
