Mexican and Guatemalan employees decide strawberries on the Faucher strawberry farm in Pont Rouge Que. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jacques Boissinot
The Auditor Normal of Canada, Karen Hogan, not too long ago issued a scathing report on Employment and Social Growth Canada’s (ESDC) lacklustre enforcement of the pandemic laws designed to guard momentary overseas farm employees.
These important employees, on whom Canadians rely for his or her native meals provide, are extremely susceptible to COVID-19 an infection as they work elbow to elbow and inhabit crowded bunkhouses supplied by the farm house owners who make use of them.
Office outbreaks had been frequent, leading to deaths and excessive caseloads amongst migrant agricultural employees. None of this could have occurred.
Learn extra:
How we deal with migrant employees who put meals on our tables: Do not Name Me Resilient EP 4
At the start of the pandemic, the Canadian authorities amended the laws to position further duties on the employers of momentary overseas employees to assist forestall the unfold of COVID-19.
These included a requirement that employers present applicable housing and pay wages through the mandated 14-day quarantine, and supply separate lodging for employees who grew to become contaminated or confirmed signs of COVID-19.
These laws had been along with current obligations to adjust to relevant employment legal guidelines, together with occupational well being and security laws and housing requirements, amplified in amendments to the laws within the Immigration and Refugee Safety Act adopted in 2015. Recognizing the added enforcement burden these COVID-related laws imposed, the federal government allotted a further $16.2 million in July 2020 to cowl the fee.
Why, then, did migrant agricultural employees endure so drastically when the federal government had supposedly taken such care to make sure their security?
What the report needed to say
The Canadian authorities didn’t implement the regulation even after it was suggested that its system of inspections and enforcement was deeply flawed.
In 2020, the ESDC evaluated nearly all employers as compliant though most quarantine inspections had little or no proof to assist that evaluation. Even worse, within the presence of proof that employers may not be following the foundations, there was indication of no additional enforcement motion. As a substitute of conducting observe up inspections or imposing penalties for violations, these employers had been labelled “compliant.”
The Auditor Normal notified senior authorities officers of her issues in December 2020 and February 2021, however the issue obtained worse. A good better share of inspection studies lacked proof to assist a discovering that employers had been compliant or that additional enforcement motion was taken when there was proof of non-compliance.

An individual holds an indication throughout a gathering to mark Day of the Useless, in Vancouver, on Nov. 1, 2020. Individuals gathered to honour the lives of migrants, refugees, undocumented folks, employees and college students who’ve died through the COVID-19 pandemic.
THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck
However the issue was not restricted to quarantine inspections. Outbreak inspections usually failed to offer sufficient info to find out whether or not employers had been offering sick or symptomatic employees with separate lodging. And common office inspections, together with these associated to housing, had been additionally usually of poor high quality and incomplete.
These are surprising findings. However why did the Canadian authorities fail to dwell as much as its dedication to guard the well being and security of momentary overseas employees whereas they grew the meals we wanted?
The Auditor Normal doesn’t fault particular person inspectors — nor will we. Relatively, she factors to managerial issues, together with misunderstandings of the urgency of pandemic necessities and poor high quality management, amongst others.
Flawed by design
We predict the issues run deeper. Together with Sarah Marsden, a regulation researcher at Thompson Rivers College, we printed a report and an article, Flawed by Design, critically scrutinizing the federal enforcement regime for momentary overseas employees earlier than the pandemic.
Based mostly on knowledge obtained by means of freedom of knowledge requests, we found that onsite inspections had been non-compulsory. Within the first six months of the 2018-19 fiscal yr (the final yr for which we had knowledge) solely about 55 per cent of inspections had been onsite.
The result of those inspections was additionally shocking. Once we checked out all accomplished inspections for the two.5 years for which we had knowledge, practically half of all employers had been discovered to be in violation the primary time. Nonetheless, of these non-compliant the primary time, 90 per cent had been labelled “compliant with intervention,” which means ultimately solely 10 per cent of inspected employers had been deemed non-compliant.
The most typical motive an employer was labelled non-compliant was for administrative causes, signifying they probably had not co-operated with the inspector.

Mexican and Guatemalan employees decide strawberries on the Faucher strawberry farm in Pont Rouge, Que.
THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jacques Boissinot
Lacklustre enforcement
The information exhibit a continuity between the light-touch enforcement regime that prevailed earlier than the pandemic and the one which adopted it. Inspectors are instructed to give attention to schooling and compliance help, not regulation enforcement.
So long as employers exhibit cooperative behaviour, it’s assumed they’ve or will adjust to the regulation with out requiring additional proof.
This sample of lax enforcement is just not distinctive to this company. We’ve studied employment requirements enforcement regimes in Canada for the reason that late nineteenth century and extra not too long ago had been a part of a crew that carried out a multi-year, multi-methods research of employment requirements enforcement in Ontario.
Within the context of the federal inspection regime, lax enforcement on the provincial stage compounds the issue as a result of federal laws require compliance with provincial and native requirements, which federal inspectors are unable to instantly implement.
Whereas the main points fluctuate, the fundamental story repeats itself. Till we acknowledge that the issues with our enforcement programs require various managerial tweaks, the sorts of issues recognized by the Auditor Normal will persist and the fundamental promise we make to employees that they are going to be protected at work will as soon as once more be damaged.

Eric Tucker acquired funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Analysis Council's Partnership Grant Program for a research on employment requirements enforcement in Ontario. He’s additionally a member of the Migrant Employee Well being Knowledgeable Working Group fashioned in 2020 to offer knowledgeable evidence-based recommendation to each federal and provincial governments so that they set up satisfactory requirements and practices to guard the well being and security of migrant agricultural employees.
Leah F. Vosko acquired funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Analysis Council of Canada's Partnership Grant Program for her participation in "Closing the Enforcement Hole: Enhancing Employment Requirements Protections for Individuals in Precarious Jobs." She can also be a member of the Migrant Employee Well being-Knowledgeable Working Group.












