Adryan Samuel Hutagalung / Shutterstock
Alas, poor Twitter; we knew it nicely. Or, at the very least, we thought we did. Regardless of by no means occupying greater than 10% of social media’s on-line presence, western audiences are very conscious of the platform. That’s not least due to the way in which that the mass media echoes and amplifies the controversies and outrage born on Twitter.
Properly earlier than the fury at present proprietor Elon Musk’s adjustments, the platform occupied a wierd twin place in our consciousness. It was a spot for the gradual murmurings of a sleepy populace gossiping across the village nicely, but additionally a discussion board for vicious, toxic invective. Birdsong calms and soothes us, but additionally conveys a warning: “That is my tree. Come any nearer and I’ll assault!”
Maybe, then, the demise of the Twitter model was inevitable. A model acts like a scar within the thoughts of a client, a reminder of previous encounters. Permitting the “shadow facet” of a model to be expressed confuses us. It maybe reminds us of our interior demons – to which we gave vent on the web site.
This Jekyll and Hyde nature of Twitter has been each embraced and confronted by Musk. As an alternative of limiting the bile, he has arguably acted in ways in which have enabled its launch.
Twitter emerged from the concepts of a number of staff on the podcasting firm Odeo in 2006. These staff included Jack Dorsey, Noah Glass, Biz Stone and Evan Williams. After encouraging an influential group of tech trade figures to turn into early adopters, Twitter subsequently skilled speedy development, in order that, by early 2010, customers have been sending 50 million tweets a day.
That 12 months, Twitter additionally overhauled its interface, permitting photos and video to be seen throughout the web site for the primary time. Celebrities began to enroll, opening up new methods for followers to work together with their favorite stars.
However the realisation by politicians that Twitter was the right place for disseminating concise messages and feedback introduced a complete new dimension to the location. They’d finally embody the US president: Barack Obama joined the platform in 2015, tweeting from the @POTUS account.
Shutterstock / Pe3k
His successor within the position, Donald Trump, was simply as enthusiastic in his use of the platform, however was rather more direct in his strategy, even utilizing it to announce insurance policies. There’s even proof Twitter performed a key position in his election success.
By this level, Twitter had nicely and actually turn into the digital “city sq.” Musk would later speak of when saying his plan to purchase the platform in 2022.
In addition to making a platform for politicians, it additionally performed a job in political activism world wide, for instance, within the Arab Spring revolutions of 2011 (though it’s exact significance has been disputed). The Egyptian authorities thought of Twitter important sufficient to reply by blocking it together with different platforms.
It additionally grew to become an amplifier of disinformation and misinformation. Pre-Musk, Twitter had made a number of efforts to crack down on this phenomenon, in addition to on trolling and hate. Among the many many issues levelled at Musk-era Twitter is the alleged reversal of those developments, confirmed by analysis however denied by Musk.
What X means for the model
This brings us as much as Twitter’s rebranding as “X”. Rebrands come and go, some attracting opprobrium, others passing fretfully into the mists of time. Typically, these adventures are underwritten by a necessity to attract a line underneath outdated model associations, liberating the corporate to turn into one thing new, totally different and greater.
However these may go mistaken. In 2001, with plans to develop into abroad markets, Royal Mail modified its identify to Consignia. A 12 months later, after monetary losses mounted, it modified the identify again once more.
In different instances, rebranding permits corporations to align with wider, worldwide necessities. Within the late Nineties, after 40 years in existence, the UK sweets model Opal Fruits modified its identify to Starburst with a purpose to align with how the product was identified overseas.
Within the case of X, each of those vectors appear to be in play, aligning the platform previously often called Twitter with Musk’s ambitions for an “the whole lot all over the place” uber-brand, whereas creating area for development –- each within the financial sense and the sense of an evolution into a unique product.
X is an undefined variable. It carries connotations of buried treasure, of “tech-bro” innovation, of racy explicitness. And, greater than something, it conveys potential. The abandonment of Twitter’s model place as gentle leisure, in favour of the platform’s darkish facet, will certainly be aided and abetted by the artwork deco brand.
Maybe this route, if one believes within the genius of Musk, moderately than the primacy of fortune, precisely displays our present trajectories towards ruthlessness at greatest or authoritarian command and management at worst.
Maybe the model, aligned intently with Musk’s different endeavours, will act much less as a scar, and extra of a scab – a continuing reminder for the billionaire that city sq. gatherings this huge can’t be managed or tamed.
Or maybe it should illuminate the hollowness of this type of human communication, which generally resembles “delinquent media”. This might free us to return to who we actually are: people embedded in a small social group of collaborative, supportive folks, in search of to flourish and develop.
Typically a fireplace doesn’t provide you with a phoenix, as a substitute it simply provides you ashes. Regardless of media characterisations on the contrary, we, the customers, nonetheless have decisions. We don’t merely, blindly, run once we hear the whistle, leaping for the subsequent shot of dopamine. So, whether or not or not Twitter is de facto “useless”, its continued success appears tougher to ensure.
Leslie Hallam doesn’t work for, seek the advice of, personal shares in or obtain funding from any firm or organisation that may profit from this text, and has disclosed no related affiliations past their educational appointment.