When Yusuf Islam – the artist previously generally known as Cat Stevens – had his first little one, he wrote her a music. Her identify was Hasanah and the music was a form of ABC of the Muslim religion:
A is for Allah, nothing however Allah … Ka is for kalima, a phrase we’re taught to show us what is nice and what’s not.
It grew to become a success throughout the Muslim world. However, because the artist defined in a 2015 interview, he wanted to go additional than that.
I immediately thought ‘Dangle on, what faculty am I going to ship her to?’ … I had a job to show my little one not solely to be academically profitable, however how you can reside.
Hasanah was born in 1980, by which level England had a considerable Muslim inhabitants. Stevens, who had transformed to Islam in 1977 and adopted his new identify in 1978, was an more and more outstanding determine in London’s Muslim neighborhood. Alongside together with his spouse, Fauzia Mubarak Ali, and a gaggle of mates, in 1983 he arrange a small main faculty in a home in Brondesbury Park, within the north-west of the town. It was to be run by the Islamic Circle Organisation. And based on the minutes of a June 1985 assembly between Yusuf Islam and Brent council’s schooling committee, the admissions coverage was that “dad and mom of a kid needs to be devoted to Islam and Islamic schooling”.
The Islamia main faculty was not the one Muslim personal faculty in England. Nor was it the one Muslim faculty contemplating an utility for state funding within the Eighties. There have been different faculties in Batley, Bradford, and within the London borough of Newham.
For my PhD analysis, I’ve extensively consulted information from the Division of Schooling and Science (DES) in England, because the Division for Schooling was identified between 1964 and 1992. The paperwork I’ve studied are held within the Nationwide Archives and in native authorities information in archives round England.
What set Islamia aside was the truth that it was based by non-immigrant converts who had the data and the clout to successfully navigate the British schooling system. Regardless of this, and even earlier than the college’s utility was submitted, my analysis exhibits that the UK authorities determined that Muslim faculties shouldn’t obtain state funding – though they have been arguably legally entitled to it.
I discovered that in 1988 the DES engineered a brand new criterion by which to evaluate whether or not faculties ought to obtain state funding. The applying was subsequently turned down with out the DES having to interact on deeper questions in regards to the place of Muslims in British society.
It’s exhausting to not interpret this as Islamophobic discrimination by the state. This interpretation is bolstered by analysis. In a 1995 comparative examine of Islamic faculties in England and the Netherlands, students Claire Dwyer and Astrid Meyer discovered that Muslims have been handled “in isolation from the precept of non secular state-funded education in different denominations”.
To place this in context, in 1985, there have been roughly 8,000 voluntary faculties in England (each aided and managed, a distinction which refers back to the relative stage of autonomy and the extent of the state funding.) The overwhelming majority of those voluntary faculties have been related to a Christian basis – both Anglican or Catholic – and a small minority have been Jewish faculties.
This story is a part of Dialog Insights
The Insights group generates long-form journalism and is working with teachers from completely different backgrounds who’ve been engaged in tasks to sort out societal and scientific challenges.
Within the wake of the publication of The Satanic Verses in 1988, Iran’s supreme chief, the Ayatollah Khomeini, issued a fatwa in opposition to the creator Salman Rushdie. Analysising how the British authorities responded to British Muslims following the Rushdie affair, Dwyer and Meyer argued that, “Muslims are constructed as outsiders who want to know the British lifestyle and their British citizenship is seen as conditional on their recognition of their tasks to the British state.”
Researchers have proven that such anti-Muslim sentiment stems from the persistent and – because the fallout from the 2014 Trojan Horse scandal in Birmingham demonstrates – dangerous concept that Islam is in opposition to western values.
In Birmingham in 2014, an nameless letter despatched to the town council alleged a plot by fundamentalist Muslims, dubbed Operation Trojan Horse, to wrest management of native faculties. Quite a few subsequent investigations discovered no proof to assist this declare, however the scandal continues nonetheless to adversely impression Muslim communities within the metropolis.
Islamia main faculty’s battle to broaden
When the Islamia faculty first opened in 1983, it was a nursery catering for a mere 13 youngsters. It rapidly outgrew the home by which it was positioned and, based on its personal historical past, was considerably oversubscribed: the demand was there for extra locations.
To be eligible for funding, as a main faculty, it wanted to have the ability to cater for no less than 175 pupils. Created by the 1944 Schooling Act, voluntary-aided standing utilized to non secular faculties which met sure standards and submitted to state monitoring. If profitable of their purposes, faculties obtained a considerable proportion of capital prices and 100% of working prices.
Amid discussions with the council about turning into voluntary-aided, the college’s first process was to safe appropriate premises which might enable it to broaden.
Having the native authority on board was essential on this course of, however negotiating with Brent Council within the Eighties was not a simple factor to do. In his ebook, Stepping on White Corns, former Brent councillor and social historian James Moher explores the historical past of Brent within the Eighties and Nineties. He quotes native journalist Invoice Montgomery, who, in an article within the Willesden and Brent Chronicle dated July 12, 1985, described the council chamber on the time as “a cross between a bullfight and visiting an establishment for the criminally insane”.
Archival information present that the council was initially considerably proof against supporting Islamia. It took the college to process on topics of race, Darwininsm within the curriculum, how girls are handled in Islam and the {qualifications} of educating workers.
Minutes from a gathering on June 3, 1985, between Yusuf Islam and Brent Council’s schooling committee – held within the Brent native archives – report that Islam acknowledged that the prophet Mohammed mentioned that it was “incumbent on all Muslims, women and men, to hunt data” and that the blending of sexes was allowed earlier than puberty in Islam. Although the information don’t specify to what precisely this was in response to, the assembly minutes listing Yusuf Islam’s assertion below the heading “Equal Alternatives”, suggesting that this level was raised in response to questions on Brent Council’s equal alternatives insurance policies. Yusuf Islam additionally acknowledged that the college’s curriculum supposed to satisfy DES necessities; that three quarters of lecturers on the faculty already had the requisite {qualifications}; and that the remaining lecturers would observe swimsuit.
After a number of conferences, in April 1986, the council’s schooling committee lastly agreed to lend the college its assist in its bid to broaden and apply for voluntary-aided standing. This means that at native authority stage, the college was deemed to have met the tutorial threshold for state funding.
Yusuf Islam was reportedly overjoyed. In a 1987 situation of Inquiry journal, he was quoted as saying:
We hope that Brent will set the pattern for different multireligious, multicultural boroughs within the nation. Brent Council is proving that it intends to reside as much as its declared coverage of equal remedy for all.
Difficulties at starting stage
That pleasure was to be shortlived. The schooling committee may need been on board, however the principle battle, at council stage, was about planning purposes. Whereas Islamia first submitted its utility in August 1986, it was solely thought of months later, in January 1987.
In a non-bylined article entitled “Anti Muslim declare as Brent drags its heels” within the Willesden and Brent Chronicle, dated November 21, 1986, the Islamic Circle Organisation was quoted as saying:
That is extensively regarded inside Brent’s 15,000 robust Muslim neighborhood as open discrimination by a Labour-controlled borough pledged to struggle racism and blatant proof that segments of the native Labour occasion appear decided to hinder the college’s progress as a lot as potential.
The varsity’s utility to broaden was initially refused. The council reasoned that having a bigger faculty in a residential space could be noisy and obtrusive for neighbouring properties. It might result in a lack of outlook and privateness and in addition carry further visitors. The truth that the college was a Muslim faculty didn’t come up explicitly.
It might maybe be remiss to not contemplate this refusal within the gentle of wider considerations amongst Brent Council’s ranks about Islamia. The choice to disclaim the college permission to broaden was taken inside the wider context of discussions in regards to the faculty’s utility for state funding. This utility is talked about within the minutes of the planning division (formally, the Improvement Management Sub-Committee).
These concerned with the college have been duly sceptical in regards to the growth sub-committee’s motives. Within the Willesden and Brent Chronicle, Yusuf Islam commented that the 19 Christian and Jewish denominational faculties within the space have been partly supported by charges and taxes paid by Muslims:
That is grossly unfair. The choice to refuse planning permission for a brand new extension to Islamia main faculty for worry of additional visitors and noise goes in opposition to all human logic and is clearly an act of discrimination.
Software for voluntary-aided standing
The varsity persevered in its bid to broaden. By mid-1989, the council had lastly granted it permission to maneuver to new premises in Queens Park, that might home the requisite 175 pupils. The varsity’s utility for state funding, nonetheless, was no much less fraught a course of.
In outlining the necessities for faculties to acquire voluntary-aided standing, the 1944 Schooling Act didn’t specify religions or denominations. Theoretically all, together with Muslims, have been eligible. Nevertheless, the negotiations over state-funded religion faculties, which led to the creation of the voluntary-aided class of faculties within the 1944 act, have been held between the Board of Schooling and leaders of Christian and Jewish communities in England. Muslim neighborhood leaders weren’t consulted.
In 1988, the Yesodey Hatorah faculty, a Charedi orthodox Jewish faculty in Hackney, London, utilized to be voluntary-aided. Archival supplies present there was concern on the Faculties Department II (the department of the DES that oversaw the tutorial wants of kids from ethnic minorities) that approving Yesodey Hatorah’s utility might set off purposes from different minority non secular communities. The identical supplies talked about the upcoming Islamia utility, earlier than commenting that “the Secretary of State will want to contemplate whether or not such a sign could be applicable”.
This sentiment was repeated in assembly minutes dated February 3, 1988. These recommended that approval of the Yesodey Hatorah utility could be a “sign that narrowly non secular faculties might be given a spot within the maintained sector”, earlier than mentioning – but once more – Islamia. The minutes then went on to state that “lots of the different 17 Muslim unbiased faculties would contemplate following swimsuit” and that if “Yesodey Hatorah is accepted there would arguably be a case for ‘come one, come all’”. Ministers ought to concentrate on the implications, the notice cautioned.
The excess-places criterion
When the Islamia faculty utilized, it did certainly face opposition. The applying was twice denied – first in Could 1990 after which on attraction, in 1993. In each cases, the rationale given was that there have been surplus faculty locations within the borough and, consequently, no case for establishing a brand new faculty.
My analysis exhibits that this surplus-places criterion was in truth launched, within the spring of 1988, in response, exactly, to Islamia’s ambitions. Particularly, held within the Nationwide Archives is a collection of drafts and redrafts of a 1988 DES briefing paper, in addition to in depth notes and correspondence in regards to the query of state-funded non secular education. Collectively, these paperwork reveal that the requirement for there to be no surplus faculty locations in an space to ensure that a brand new faculty to be granted funding, was added solely after the DES had decided that it was unlikely to have the ability to refuse Islamia on current standards (concerning curriculum, premises and admissions).
On Could 20, 1988, a gathering occurred between the secretary of state for schooling, Kenneth Baker, and the house secretary, Douglas Hurd. The minutes of this assembly are held within the Faculties Department II file within the Nationwide Archives regarding the Yesodey Hatorah Faculty.
Baker questioned whether or not it was proper for the federal government to offer help for faculties which, as he put it, “particularly got down to educate youngsters a distinct lifestyle from the nation at giant”. He talked about “the strict Muslim educating with regard to the function of girls”. This chimes with different considerations voiced within the media and amongst politicians on the time.
Authorities worry of ‘excessive sects’
The DES minutes of the assembly state that the house secretary’s view was that the secretary of state for schooling ought to refuse purposes for voluntary-aided faculties by “excessive sects” the place he had grounds for considering that they might “emphasise separateness”.
As authorities stories, together with the 1985 Swann report, present, the worry on the time was that if so-called separate faculties grew in numbers, it might result in “de facto racial segregation”, to cite a 1990 report entitled Faculties of religion: non secular faculties in a multicultural society (a duplicate of which is within the British Library).
The primary draft of the briefing paper, written by Faculties Department II, outlined Baker’s views. In it, the secretary of state for schooling argues that have been he to approve the Yesodey Hatorah proposal, “I’d not discover it simple thereafter to withstand the calls for, notably of the Moslem [sic] neighborhood, for separate faculties”.
Baker then says that he shall not have the ability to rely on discovering instructional causes for rejecting such proposals. “The proposers will usually have the ability to make a persuasive case that they may have the ability to adjust to my necessities for aided standing and their purposes might have appreciable instructional strengths, as certainly has that of Yesodey Hatorah. The introduction of the nationwide curriculum within the maintained sector will present a surer base on which to evaluate whether or not candidates are placing ahead sound proposals, however it might be unwise to contemplate that they may show unwilling or unable to take action.”
A subsequent redraft of the paper then states, “there’ll should be not solely a denominational want for brand spanking new faculty locations however an total want for such locations within the space of the native schooling authority (LEA).”
Throughout a dialogue within the spring of 1988 concerning the drafting and redrafting of this briefing paper, as recorded within the DES file within the Nationwide Archives, the query was raised as as to whether faculties ought to exhibit that they have been already educating an acceptable curriculum – in step with the nationwide curriculum – or whether or not they need to present that they might accomplish that as soon as they obtained the funding. BM Norbury, a member of Faculties Department II, famous that, “to this layman, Islamia main faculty in Brent may qualify even below this criterion”.
It’s clear then that at each native authority and governmental ranges, the Islamia faculty had been discovered doubtless to have the ability to meet the acknowledged necessities for receiving voluntary-aided standing. The DES had successfully determined not that it ought to approve state funding for Islamia, however that it ought to search different justifications for refusing it. The excess-places criterion offered this.
Tellingly, and against this, subsequent archival paperwork reveal that that very same surplus-places criterion was not utilized to Yesodey Hatorah or to different Jewish faculties, which have been accredited within the early Nineties on the idea of denominational, however not total, want.
A DES inside notice, dated July 1988 and held within the Nationwide Archives, explicitly acknowledged that “the very fact that there have been surplus locations in voluntary and county faculties within the space shouldn’t be a cloth think about figuring out the Yesodey Hatorah utility.” These surplus locations, the notice specified, have been the Inside London Schooling Authority’s duty: “They’d not be crammed by the youngsters who attended the Yesodey Hatorah faculties.” In different phrases, the exception made for the youngsters of this Jewish faith-based faculty was not prolonged to these from Islamia, a Muslim faith-based faculty.
Muslims in Britain
By the point the Islamia faculty had submitted its utility for state funding, the Rushdie affair was in full swing. The Instances Academic Complement couched these governmental selections in what it referred to as “a jittery non secular and political local weather”, amid the expansion of Islamic fundamentalism.
A debate in regards to the place of Muslims in Britain was unfolding within the press. In Could 1989, a Instances newspaper chief column opposed state-funded Muslim faculties, asserting that “Islam shouldn’t be a European religion, and certainly defines itself as a separate and complete civilisation at odds with many key European cultural and political values”.
That very same 12 months, the house workplace minister, Tim Renton, gave a speech (the textual content of which is held within the Nationwide Archives) to the Coventry Conservative Anglo-Asians, by which he argued in opposition to state-funded Muslim faculties. “On this nation,” he mentioned, “our custom favours the equal remedy of girls – affording women the identical instructional and profession probabilities as boys.”
But, as I’ve discovered, the one place that dialogue was not taking part in out was between the state and Muslim faculties. The federal government merely refused to clarify why it didn’t need to fund them.
When John Greenway, Conservative MP for Ryedale, enquired on behalf of a constituent on January 11, 1989, the DES replied (in correspondence discovered within the Nationwide Archives) that he ought to assert the fitting of any non secular group to use for voluntary-aided education. Every faculty, the division’s response acknowledged, could be thought of based on its particular person deserves.
The archive exhibits that others enquiring about Muslim education at this level obtained comparable responses. One other inside DES memo (held within the Nationwide Archives) refers to this response as “the usual line in explaining how the secretary of state will contemplate all purposes for voluntary-aided standing. It doesn’t enter into debate on the case for and in opposition to Muslim faculties”.
Paddy Ashdown, then chief of the Liberal Democrats, based on the Muslim Information in August 1991, put it bluntly:
The current authorities is certainly working double requirements over the granting of voluntary-aided standing to Muslim faculties.
This solely confirmed what some individuals in Muslim communities had lengthy suspected. As Islamia co-founder Ibrahim Hewitt mentioned, in an article within the Instances Academic Complement from November 1, 1991, the approval of funding for Jewish faculties presently confirmed “that there’s one regulation for one group and one other regulation for one more group”.
When Islamia faculty’s utility for state funding was refused, for a second time in 1993, Yusuf Islam reportedly expressed frustration at this double customary. He famous that round 4,000 Christian and Jewish faculties have been recipients of presidency funding. “We’ve got seen all of it earlier than,” he mentioned. “We at the moment are in peril of closing due to the shortage of funds.”
And when it emerged, in August 1994, that the Jewish Hasmonean main faculty, a close-by institution within the London Borough of Barnet, had been accredited for voluntary-aided standing shortly after Islamia’s second refusal, these emotions of rejection among the many Muslim communities have been solely amplified.
The Hasmonean choice had been saved secret for a number of months. Ahmed Versi, editor of the Muslim Information, referred to as the federal government out. In a Instances Schooling Complement article, dated August 5, 1994, he mentioned:
That is discriminatory. Sadly, Muslims should not protected as a result of there isn’t any particular regulation of non secular discrimination, so we can not take the federal government to courtroom.
The primary state-funded Muslim faculty
The Islamia faculty didn’t see itself as a separate faculty. From the outset it constantly aimed to work with the state schooling system. That is evidenced as early as 1986, within the introduction to the college’s proposal for brand spanking new premises:
We’ve got been attempting to acquire voluntary-aided standing, wanting –- as we do –- to “opt-in” to the LEA –- as a result of we worth the enter that the LEA gives.
An analogous sentiment was expressed in an oral submission the Islamia Faculty Belief made to Brent Council’s working occasion on post-primary reorganisation in 1988.
The belief wished to be concerned within the schooling system of the authority. It wished to dispel the sensation of the college being a ghetto establishment exterior the norms. As well as, the college wished to have the ability to profit from the advisory and assist companies which the authority was capable of supply.
And in 1994, at the same time as he accused the federal government of discrimination and worry of Islam, precept Azam Baig reiterated the college’s intention: “We don’t need to be a Saudi faculty or a Libyan faculty or a Pakistani faculty,” he advised the Washington Put up. “No, we need to be a British faculty.”
When requested, in a 2015 interview, how he got here to arrange the Islamia faculty within the first place, Yusuf Islam commented that as a proactive particular person, he didn’t depend on others to do what he wanted to do. “We didn’t know the way profitable it might be,” he mentioned, “the intention was to easily present for my little one.”
His dedication to seeing it by way of was full. He was there each morning, serving to out with PE and admin. Because the headmaster put it as soon as within the faculty’s early years, “Yusuf is completely devoted and that is his mission”. The Washington Put up function of 1994 famous that, regardless of tuition charges and personal donations, he personally remained the college’s main benefactor.
That dedication paid off. Lastly, in 1998, the Islamia faculty was ultimately granted state funding.
Together with the Al Furqan Faculty in Birmingham, Islamia was the primary Muslim faculty within the UK to attain this. It had taken over a decade of, as Yusuf Islam’s web site places it, “ceaseless campaigning”.
Reporting on the choice, the Instances Schooling Complement commented that, “for the Muslims, the choice marks a milestone. One of many foremost religions in Britain, it’s the just one to have been constantly rejected for public funding for its faculties”. An extra remark piece within the paper argued that Muslim faculties had felt largely ignored by the tutorial institution and had appeared considerably remoted and defensive.
It’s a sentiment for which, as I’ve proven, there have been plain grounds. Additionally it is a sentiment borne out by the remedy of Muslims within the Trojan Horse affair in Birmingham, most lately aired within the eponymous New York Instances and Serial investigative collaboration, The Trojan Horse Affair podcast. That scandal has solid a shadow as long as to, within the phrases of extremism scholar Chris Allen, have the potential to stigmatise a whole era of Muslims.
In 2010, NBC journalist Jennifer Carlile famous that the Islamia main faculty now counted 3,500 youngsters on its ready listing and Prince Charles and Muhammed Ali amongst its mates. “It units the requirements,” Carlile wrote,“ for budding non-Christian state-funded faculties.”
If that reads like a victory of types, there isn’t any query that it was hard-earned. The Islamophobic suspicion at governmental stage that lengthy plagued Islamia – regardless of its evident success as an academic establishment – persevered effectively into the twenty first century.
For you: extra from our Insights collection:
London’s Olympic legacy: analysis reveals why £2.2 billion funding in main faculty PE has failed lecturers
The within story of Restoration: how the world’s largest COVID-19 trial remodeled remedy – and what it might do for different ailments
Inside a reintegration camp for Colombia’s ex-guerrilla fighters: ‘Phrases of reconciliation are our solely weapons now’
To listen to about new Insights articles, be part of the a whole lot of hundreds of people that worth The Dialog’s evidence-based information. Subscribe to our publication.
Helen Carr doesn’t work for, seek the advice of, personal shares in or obtain funding from any firm or organisation that will profit from this text, and has disclosed no related affiliations past their educational appointment.
