The Volodymyr the Nice monument, erected in 1853, in Kyiv. Volodymyr was a warlord who grew to become the primary Russian ruler to transform to Christianity within the late 900s. The same statue was erected in Moscow in 2016 as a counter to Ukraine's. (Shutterstock)
Vladimir Putin’s curiosity in historical past is well-known. He has accused Poland of beginning the Second World Warfare. He maintains that the Soviet Union liberated the western world from Nazism and any dialogue over that view is “historic revisionism.”
His focus has been four-pronged.
First, just like the narrative of the previous Soviet Union, Putin regards the tenth century Kyivan Rus state as the muse of recent Russia, Ukraine and Belarus. A statue to the primary prince to embrace Christianity, Volodymyr (in Russian, Vladimir), was erected in Moscow in 2016, a provocative counter to the a lot older one which’s been in Kyiv since 1853.
On this means, Russia challenged Ukraine’s historic legacy as the primary of the japanese Slavic states to embrace the Orthodox faith.
Second, Putin perceives the interval of the Russian Empire — spanning 1721 to 1917 — as a optimistic phenomenon. In March 2014, when Russia annexed Crimea from Ukraine, he made reference to the return of the peninsula to the “Russian harbour” and to the revival of what he termed the “Russkiy mir (Russian world).”
Demonizing Ukrainian nationalism
Putin’s third focus is Ukrainian nationalism from the Thirties to early Fifties, significantly the wing of the Group of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUNb) led by Stepan Bandera after 1940 and the 1942 formation of its navy, the Ukrainian Rebel Military (UPA).

Activists of varied Ukrainian nationalist events carry a portrait of Stepan Bandera throughout a rally in Kyiv in January 2022. Bandera, founding father of a insurgent military that fought in opposition to the Soviet regime, was assassinated in Germany in 1959.
(AP Photograph/Efrem Lukatsky)
At sure factors each the OUNb and the UPA collaborated with the German occupying forces and the UPA fought Soviet safety forces in a protracted battle in western Ukraine till the early Fifties.
The struggle was brutal, bitter and nothing was yielded by both facet. The Soviet Union had superior forces and ultimately prevailed. Roman Shukhevych, the commander of UPA, was killed in a skirmish close to Lviv in 1950. Bandera was poisoned by Soviet brokers in Germany in 1959.
The Soviet Union subsequently demonized each the OUNb and UPA, portraying them as Nazi collaborators and traitors to their nation. However within the Ukrainian diaspora of North America and Europe, they had been heroes and “fighters for Ukrainian independence.”
Learn extra:
Putin’s declare to rid Ukraine of Nazis is particularly absurd given its historical past
Maidan rebellion
Putin’s fourth focus has centred on 2014, when the Maidan (Ukrainian for “central sq.”) rebellion reached its peak in Kyiv and different cities and the UPA red-and-black flag appeared on the streets among the many array of blue-and-yellow Ukrainian flags. The Proper Sector and the political get together Svoboda, each from the far proper political spectrum, entered the battle.

On this February 2014 picture, monuments to Kyiv’s founders burn as anti-government protesters conflict with riot police within the metropolis’s Independence Sq..
(AP Photograph/Efrem Lukatsky, File)
The protests turned violent, and in the end the president of Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovych, fled to Russia.
In accordance with Putin and his associates, “neo-Nazis” had taken over Ukraine in a coup d’état. The assertion was used particularly to justify Russia’s annexation of Crimea.
Warfare broke out within the Donbas area of japanese Ukraine following the intervention of Russia in alliance with some native leaders. Some within the far japanese areas of Ukraine had been outraged by the Maidan clashes and the Might 2014 killing of 42 anti-Maidan activists in Odessa.
Russia intervened straight on this struggle twice — in August 2014 and February 2015 — to make sure the separatists weren’t defeated by Ukraine’s “anti-terrorist operation” launched by appearing President Oleksandr Turchynov.
What now?
Do Putin’s 4 historic lenses clarify his Ukraine invasion? Or has he been fuelled just by his perception that Russia and Ukraine needs to be joined as one individuals linked by historical past, faith and tradition?
Oddly, Putin made no try both in 2014 or in 2022 to reinstate Yanukovych as president, demonstrating his whole insecurity in his former acolyte.
And his accusations of Nazism in Ukraine don’t mirror the truth of the modifications launched within the nation since 2014.
Yanukovych was changed by an oligarch, Petro Poroshenko, who adjusted shortly to the unconventional temper within the nation. He authorised the 2015 Reminiscence Legal guidelines that made it unlawful to show Soviet symbols in Ukraine. Lenin statues had been toppled and Communist metropolis and avenue names eradicated.

On this 2013 picture, an anti-government protester beats the statue of Vladimir Lenin with a sledgehammer in Kyiv.
(AP Photograph/Sergei Chuzavkov)
The far-right squads from Proper Sector and Svoboda that had infiltrated the Maidan protests did not make any influence politically.
They had been additionally negligible within the 2019 elections when Volodymyr Zelensky, a TV comic with no political background, defeated Poroshenko in a landslide. They gained one seat between them when his rapidly constructed centrist get together Servant of the Folks swept parliament.
Learn extra:
Volodymyr Zelensky’s enchantment lies in his service to Ukrainians above all else
What does this all imply? As an impartial nation, Ukraine has suffered from corruption, poverty and violent intervals, however Putin’s accusations hardly describe right now’s actuality.
Ukraine is extra democratic than Russia, it holds common elections, and there’s relative freedom of speech and meeting. This supposed “neo-Nazi” regime is led by a Russophone Jew from japanese Ukraine.
Putin’s view of Ukrainian historical past and present forces in Ukraine is deeply, maybe intentionally flawed.

David Roger Marples doesn’t work for, seek the advice of, personal shares in or obtain funding from any firm or organisation that will profit from this text, and has disclosed no related affiliations past their educational appointment.












