Shutterstock
About two years into the pandemic, we’re nonetheless looking for the place and the way it began. Solely final week, we heard bats in Laos might maintain a clue concerning the origin of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID.
Our curiosity in viral origins, particularly pandemic viruses, is comprehensible. However we have to bear in mind one key lesson from historical past. It will probably take years to pin down their animal supply.
Right here’s why it’s essential to maintain attempting and – within the case of the origin of SARS-CoV-2 – why it’s too quickly to count on miracles.
Learn extra:
I used to be the Australian physician on the WHO’s COVID-19 mission to China. Here is what we discovered concerning the origins of the coronavirus
We will study from the previous
Rising infectious illnesses like COVID have gotten an growing drawback. Most are zoonotic. In different phrases, they originate in non-human animals, primarily wildlife.
Nevertheless, figuring out these animal sources and the way the viruses entered human populations is troublesome. It is a main drawback.
If we will establish sources and routes of spillover, then we must be higher capable of perceive the processes driving emergence of latest illnesses. This implies we might higher predict when and the place spillover is prone to happen sooner or later.
Understanding the underlying processes would additionally assist us devise methods to both scale back the chance of wildlife illnesses transferring to people, or to nip spillover within the bud earlier than an epidemic or pandemic happens.
Learn extra:
How do viruses mutate and leap species? And why are ‘spillovers’ changing into extra widespread?
That is all very arduous, however predictably so
Within the case of SARS-CoV-2, some folks say scientists’ lack of ability up to now to establish the supply wildlife inhabitants and to undoubtedly say how the virus entered human populations suggests the virus originated in a laboratory. But the lab origin idea has been totally debunked.
Nevertheless, this delay find definitive solutions isn’t uncommon. For a lot of lately emerged human viruses, the wildlife supply (the pure reservoir) took years to establish, or continues to be reasonably unclear.
For instance, Ebola has triggered devastating outbreaks of lethal haemorrhagic illness in Africa because the Nineteen Seventies.
Most scientists suppose bats are the reservoir. But nobody has but efficiently remoted Ebola virus from a wild bat, regardless of numerous circumstantial proof.
How about bats and COVID?
The closest identified animal virus to SARS-CoV-2 happens in a species of horseshoe bat discovered all through China and Southeast Asia. That virus is known as RaTG13.
Though RaTG13 and SARS-CoV-2 are 96.1% related of their genetic code total, this doesn’t essentially imply the human SARS-CoV-2 got here immediately from these bats.
In the identical means, whereas chimpanzees are the closest residing relations of people, we undoubtedly didn’t descend from chimpanzees, nor did chimpanzees descend from us.
The DNA of chimpanzees and people is nearly similar. However that doesn’t imply we’re immediately associated.
Shutterstock
Genetic similarity between two species tells us they’re linked in a “household tree” to a standard ancestor. The extent of that similarity offers some details about how lengthy it was because the two species arose from that ancestor.
For SARS-CoV-2 and the bat coronavirus RaTG13, this separation probably occurred some many years in the past.
Viral household bushes have ‘tangles’
To make issues extra advanced, some viruses may also purchase genetic modifications through recombination. This happens when two completely different virus strains or species infect the identical cell. They will swap bits of genetic code with one another, producing a “mosaic” virus. This implies the “household tree” turns into extra like a tangle of brushwood.
So, reasonably than on the lookout for a single coronavirus because the ancestor of SARS-CoV-2, we have to have a look at an entire vary of associated viruses that may co-occur in nature.
Extra proof for this got here simply final week, in a paper printed within the prestigious journal Nature.
It discovered beforehand unknown bat viruses in Laos that aren’t fairly as intently associated to SARS-CoV-2 as RaTG13 total. However a few of these bat viruses from Laos are extra intently associated to SARS-CoV-2 than RaTG13 on the explicit area that permits the virus to bind to human cells.
This implies SARS-CoV-2 probably arose from mixing of various bat coronaviruses in pure bat populations. That is probably how SARS-CoV-2 acquired the genetic sequence that permits it to bind to human cells and infect people.
Learn extra:
Why it would quickly be too late to search out out the place the COVID-19 virus originated
What about pangolins?
Pangolins are scaly mammals thought of a delicacy in components of Asia and are severely endangered by the wildlife commerce. There was loads of dialogue concerning the chance pangolins might have been a bridge species that enabled the switch of this coronavirus from bats to people.
These concepts arose as a result of we all know some extremely pathogenic (illness inflicting) rising viruses in people do certainly have a bridge host. Bats infect them they usually, in flip, cross the virus to people.
For instance, we work on Hendra virus in Australia, the place horses act as a bridge host. Flying foxes (a sort of bat) infect horses, which in flip, infect people.
Equally, MERS (Center East respiratory syndrome) is attributable to a coronavirus of bats which has handed to camels after which on to people.
With the brand new coronaviruses detected in bats in Laos, our understanding of the function of pangolins has modified. It seems each pangolins and people are contaminated by coronaviruses derived from bats, however the human virus didn’t come through pangolins.
How did a coronavirus get from bats in caves to people in Wuhan?
This crucial query stays a thriller. Individuals go into the caves the place these horseshoe bats dwell, typically to gather guano (bat faeces) for fertiliser. However the nearest bat caves are a long way from Wuhan.
No bats have been bought within the Wuhan moist market that lots of the earliest circumstances have been linked to.
Nevertheless, Wuhan is a serious metropolis and transport hub. So an contaminated one that had been in these caves might nicely have handed by way of Wuhan, and visited the moist markets.
SARS-CoV-2 is now identified to contaminate a variety of different mammals. So additionally it is potential a bat or a human might have contaminated one other mammal, which then handed by way of the Wuhan moist market.
Learn extra:
New preliminary proof suggests coronavirus jumped from animals to people a number of instances
What will we nonetheless need to know?
Classes learnt from different viruses meant that early on within the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, we had a strong foundation for hypothesising the virus had hyperlinks to bats and fairly probably arose by way of a bridging host within the wildlife market.
We nonetheless have unanswered questions concerning the path the virus took from bats to people. However the extra we proceed to look in bat populations, the extra we discover these items of SARS-CoV-2 genetic code exist already in nature.
As with different rising viruses, if we hold trying, we might ultimately discover all of the lacking items we have to shut the case on the place SARS-CoV-2 got here from. If we’re good, we’ll use this data to take motion to stop the following pandemic.
Hamish McCallum receives funding from ARC, and the US companies NSF, NIH and DARPA.
Alison Peel receives funding from ARC, and the US companies NSF and DARPA.
