VR headsets let customers discover pure settings like seashores, greenery and oceans, selecting the time of day and the climate. (Shutterstock)
As nature connection researchers, we’re conscious of the innumerable advantages of spending time outdoors in nature. We’re additionally conscious that, like so many different interactions, immersing oneself in nature is an expertise that’s now obtainable just about. In truth, digital actuality (VR) firms now promote VR nature as instruments for company wellness.
Some universities have additionally added VR to employees or scholar companies. Once we discovered that our employees affiliation at College of Waterloo was providing a brand new wellness initiative linked to nature, our pleasure light upon realizing the initiative wasn’t about actual nature — equivalent to encouraging employees members to take common breaks to sit down by the stream on campus, or to stroll round close by Columbia Lake — however VR nature.
Headsets can be obtainable to be used in libraries pre-loaded with the Nature Treks VR app, which lets customers discover pure settings like seashores, greenery and oceans, selecting the time of day and the climate.
Waterloo is just not the primary establishment to show to such instruments to help well-being. The McGill Pupil Wellness Hub equally provides VR periods with “Conscious Escapes,” an app during which customers can “embark on digital journeys to serene landscapes, calming forests, ocean depths or mountain adventures.”
VR nature seems to be a wellness development.
Technological nature

Digital actuality firms now promote VR nature as a device for company wellness.
(Shutterstock)
We’re skeptical that VR nature will allow the various advantages that actual nature provides. What may be the implications of such “technological nature” — nature mediated and augmented by a technological interface?
Peter H. Kahn of the College of Washington, who has finished foundational work on this area, concludes from a mess of research that:
“when it comes to human well-being, technological nature is best than no nature, however inferior to precise nature.”
Turning to know-how equivalent to VR headsets for nature immersion contributes to what one skilled in environmental psychology, Susan Clayton, calls a metamorphosis of expertise. First, VR permits the person to manage and due to this fact optimize and homogenize their nature expertise, maybe choosing solely superb climate and probably the most sensational or pristine wilderness. Technologically optimized depictions of nature “could lead folks to be much less fascinated with, or happy by, messy, unexciting, native ecosystems.”
Would possibly VR headsets diminish customers’ appreciation of immersive and restorative nature experiences that may be discovered of their native greenspace?
Sensory immersion

The disparities in advantages between the digital and actual nature experiences increase a giant query: Why are wellness initiatives investing in these new tech instruments slightly than hands-on experiences that prioritize sensory immersion?
(Shutterstock)
Second, VR headsets fail to supply the sensory immersion and embodiment of precise nature. Sensory inputs equivalent to odor, sound, contact and sight are all intertwined within the advanced relationship between nature immersion and well-being, however VR headsets take away the sensuality of nature experiences.
For instance, stimulating one’s sense of contact can result in elevated psychological restoration and quite a few tree species produce chemical compounds which have psychological and physiological advantages. The quickly rising space of analysis on the microbiome-brain connection stresses the significance of encountering useful micro organism by means of contact with soil, one thing {that a} VR headset can not replicate.
And at last, a recurrent difficulty with VR headset use is the onset of “cybersickness,” nausea that seems to be exacerbated by strolling or motion. This may increasingly make customers of VR headsets cautious of shifting whereas carrying the headset, which is one other drawback in comparison with being outdoors free of 1.
Along with shedding these sides of expertise in nature, one other issue we marvel about is the proof base for buying these gadgets. The examine cited within the College of Waterloo announcement, which particularly evaluates the efficacy of Nature Treks VR for wellness, lacked a management group and had a small pattern measurement. The examine authors state that attributable to their lack of a management group, “a causal relationship between the VR expertise and members’ temper couldn’t be established.”
Extra analysis on the distinction between VR and actual nature for well-being should be undertaken to scrupulously evaluate the 2.
Entry and fairness points
VR nature experiences could enchantment to those that didn’t develop up with alternatives to have immersive experiences in nature and thus don’t really feel fully comfy there. They might additionally enchantment to those that have accessibility limitations.
Nonetheless, defaulting to VR may contribute to the prevailing inequity in entry to the advantages of actual nature immersion. It might make it simpler to show to technological nature experiences slightly than creating accessible nature programming.
Learn extra:
How cities can keep away from ‘inexperienced gentrification’ and make city forests accessible
The disparities in advantages between the digital and actual nature experiences increase a giant query: why are wellness initiatives investing in these new tech instruments slightly than hands-on experiences that prioritize sensory immersion?
Funding alternatives usually appear to favour the brand new “techno-fix” that provides a streamlined and easy resolution. However the introduction of such instruments necessitates reflection on values of office wellness. Is the aim to realize wellness as effectively as potential, as a substitute of aspiring to the simplest modalities?
Relatively than donning headsets, we encourage folks to have interaction in easy outside actions to domesticate a deeper reference to nature. There’s rather a lot to be mentioned for making use of no matter inexperienced area you’ve entry to: go outdoors, decelerate and, if potential, odor the proverbial roses.

Savannah Stuart receives funding from OGS.
Brendon Larson receives funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Analysis Council of Canada (SSHRC).
Steffanie Scott receives funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Analysis Council of Canada (SSHRC).












