THE CANADIAN PRESS/Justin Tang
Public training about Canada’s remedy of Indigenous Peoples is a crucial part of the method of reconciliation.
Figuring out the historical past can higher assist residents perceive present challenges and equip them with the instruments to work respectfully with Indigenous Peoples to construct a greater future, in step with the part on “training for reconciliation” within the Fact and Reconciliation Fee’s remaining report.
A lot of this public training happens in colleges, via the media and even through discussions amongst buddies and inside households. However new immigrants to Canada would possibly miss a few of this socialization (relying on their age of arrival) as a result of they’ll have much less publicity to Canadian colleges and media of their early life.
This might have an effect on their attitudes to Indigenous Peoples and assist for the method of reconciliation itself. On condition that one in 5 Canadians was born overseas, this is able to pose a big political threat.
Alternatively, it’s attainable that, regardless of much less publicity to Canadian colleges and media, immigrants is perhaps extra supportive of Indigenous Peoples as a result of they might be extra conscious of the legacies of colonialism worldwide, extra open to find out about their new nation or extra aware of their accountability as newcomers to study Canadian historical past.
Supportive of Indigenous Peoples
The query of how immigrants understand Indigenous Peoples in Canada, and vice versa, is due to this fact related however not often explored.
However information from the Confederation of Tomorrow 2021 survey, carried out by the Environics Institute and together with sufficiently massive samples of each immigrants and Indigenous Peoples, permits us to look at these points.
Particularly, we will discover perceptions of immigrants in the direction of Indigenous Peoples and reconciliation, and take a look at responses to 3 questions:
How acquainted do you’re feeling you might be with the historical past of Indian Residential Faculties in Canada?
In your opinion, have governments in Canada gone too far or have they not gone far sufficient in attempting to advance reconciliation with Indigenous peoples?
Do you imagine that particular person Canadians do, or don’t, have a task to play in efforts to result in reconciliation between Indigenous and non-Indigenous individuals?
The survey outcomes typically present that, regardless of much less familiarity or certainty about these points amongst new immigrants in comparison with these born in Canada, they’re extra more likely to assist Indigenous Peoples.
Hole in data
The survey exhibits a giant hole between how acquainted Indigenous Peoples and non-Indigenous individuals — each immigrants to Canada and non-immigrants — are with the historical past of Indian Residential colleges.
The findings recommend first-generation immigrants are much less doubtless than non-Indigenous Canadians to say they’re “very acquainted” with this historical past, and usually tend to categorical no opinion.
These outcomes point out that first-generation immigrants don’t know as a lot as different Canadians in regards to the historical past of Indian Faculties in Canada. It’s notable, nevertheless, that second-generation Canadians are extra doubtless than third-generation Canadians to really feel “very acquainted” with the historical past of Indian Residential Faculties.
Creator offered, Creator offered
This lesser familiarity amongst first-generation immigrants, nevertheless, doesn’t translate into decrease assist for efforts to advance reconciliation.
Authorities response
This assist is clear after they had been requested about whether or not governments have gone too far, or not far sufficient, to advance reconciliation.
Probably the most putting distinction — not surprisingly — is that Indigenous Peoples are more likely than non-Indigenous Canadians to say that governments have didn’t go far sufficient to advance reconciliation.
However first-generation immigrants are simply as more likely to maintain this view than second- or third-generation Canadians. First-generation immigrants are additionally much less more likely to say that governments have gone too far of their efforts to advertise reconciliation — a consequence that’s vital when controlling for training (which is a crucial step since first-generation immigrants usually tend to be university-educated than the remainder of the inhabitants).
First-generation immigrants are additionally much less more likely to take a definitive place both means, and usually tend to say “neither” or “can’t say.”
Creator offered, Creator offered
The position of Canadians
Equally, Indigenous Peoples are unsurprisingly the most probably to say that particular person Canadians have a task to play in reconciliation.
However first-generation immigrants are simply as doubtless as second- or third-generation Canadians to carry this view (though first-generation immigrants are additionally extra more likely to don’t have any opinion on this query).
Creator offered, Creator offered
These outcomes are encouraging as a result of they recommend that even when immigrants aren’t socialized in Canada at a younger age, that’s not an impediment to constructing understanding and assist for reconciliation.
Indigenous assist for immigration
Curiously, the survey additionally permits us to discover the opposite aspect of the connection between immigrants and Indigenous Peoples in Canada, specifically assist amongst Indigenous Peoples for immigration.
This can be a probably contentious subject. On the one hand, numerous sources of immigration within the post-Second World Conflict interval have already disrupted the narrative of Canada as a nation of two founding peoples (British and French). That in flip suggests a view of Canada that isn’t solely multicultural however multi-national, and inclusive of Indigenous Peoples and nations.
On this sense, the pursuits of immigrants and Indigenous Peoples might be aligned. However on the similar time, the continued arrival of newcomers might be seen as a continuation of the settler/colonization course of.
THE CANADIAN PRESS/Chad Hipolito
Ideas on immigration
We will discover this subject by referring to a query within the survey asking Canadians whether or not they agree or disagree that “total, there may be an excessive amount of immigration to Canada.”
The outcomes present that there are vital variations in attitudes about immigration between the final inhabitants and Indigenous Peoples. Thirty per cent of Indigenous peoples “strongly agree” with the assertion, the very best proportion amongst all teams.
Creator offered, Creator offered
Nonetheless, this normal distinction about immigration ranges is pushed largely by the distinction in views between Indigenous Peoples and first-generation immigrants. Whereas Indigenous Peoples, in comparison with first-generation immigrants, usually tend to strongly agree than strongly disagree that there’s an excessive amount of immigration to Canada, there aren’t any statistically vital variations between Indigenous Peoples and second- or third-generation Canadians.
This means that the important thing issue influencing attitudes in the direction of immigration won’t be Indigenous identification, however being born in Canada.
Nonetheless, this discovering is necessary as a result of it’s a reminder to proponents of extra immigration that they need to be open to and interact with Indigenous Peoples’ views on this subject. Immigration, as a coverage goal, must be pursued with a watch on the way it is perhaps perceived by those that had been displaced by the sooner arrival of settlers.
This text analyzes information from The Confederation of Tomorrow 2021 survey. This survey was funded by the Environics Institute for Survey Analysis, the Centre of Excellence on the Canadian Federation, the Canada West Basis, the Centre D’Analyse Politique – Structure et Fédéralisme, the Brian Mulroney Institute of Authorities, and the Johnson Shoyama Graduate Faculty of Public Coverage. The evaluation and views in introduced on this article are these of authors alone and don’t essentially signify the views of any of the funding organizations.
Anna Triandafyllidou receives funding from SSHRC as a part of her Canada Excellence Analysis Chair in Migration and Integration. The analysis behind this text has been supported by the CERC Migration total grant.
Seyda labored as a researcher for the Canada Excellence Analysis Chair in Migration and Integration at Toronto Metropolitan College. The current article relies on findings from that work.