Shutterstock
Twenty-something Melburnian Harrison Pawluck might be doing worse issues than constructing a TikTok viewers by way of “random acts of kindness”.
He’s not out on the streets pulling dangerous pranks or upsetting indignant confrontations. He doesn’t promote bogus cryptocurrency schemes, most cancers cures or conspiracy theories. As a substitute he movies strangers’ reactions to him doing issues comparable to paying for his or her groceries or handing them flowers.
Even so, the controversy sparked by his most profitable video up to now (seen practically 65 million occasions) underlines the problematic ethics of “feel-good” content material – each for creators and shoppers.
The 19-second video reveals Pawluck asking an aged lady in a meals corridor to carry a bouquet of flowers as he places on a jacket. He then needs her a beautiful day and walks off. “I hope this made her day higher,” the caption reads. It didn’t.
Harrison’s
CC BY
Since changing into conscious of the viral video, Melbourne lady Maree has spoken out about feeling patronised and exploited. Pawluk has provided an apology of types, however mentioned he gained’t cease make such movies:
I do know my true intentions and I do know that, if I can encourage even 1% of the folks that watch my content material to go on the market and do one thing good, I’ve accomplished one thing that I consider is sweet for the world.
This defence would work higher if Pawluck weren’t monetising his movies. The actual fact there’s a marketplace for such content material, nonetheless, raises questions. How can content material be actually altruistic with so many industrial elements at play?
What’s eudaimonic media?
From holding life-affirming indicators in malls to hugging strangers, giving homeless individuals large wads of money and rescuing stray animals, “random acts of kindness” have proved a well-liked video style on social media channels.
In media research we name these movies “eudaimonic media” – from the traditional Greek phrase “eudaimonia”. That is typically translated as that means “happiness” however the thinker Aristotle used it to consult with the very best human good – to residing a lifetime of advantage.
Aristotle’s ‘eudaimonic ethics’ involved residing a lifetime of ethical excellence.
Shutterstock
In distinction to hedonistic media – content material that’s all about private gratification and pleasure – eudaimonic media is supposed to make us mirror on life’s goal, potential, advantage and that means.
Really feel-good outweighs feel-bad
For all of the give attention to social media’s capability to advertise “engagement” by way of sensationalism, polarisation and interesting to individuals’s worst feelings, the marketplace for eudaimonic content material stays far larger.
Learn extra:
Anger is all the fashion on Twitter when it is chilly exterior (and on Mondays)
A survey of greater than 777 million Fb posts in 2019, for instance, discovered “love” emojis accounted for about half of all video reactions in 2018 (in contrast with 4.5% “indignant” emojis).
Fb’s most watched video that 12 months, with greater than 361 million views, was of Jay Shetty, a Hindu monk turned life coach/influencer giving an inspirational discuss to high school college students (scored with poignant piano music).
Jay Shetty’s homily to high school college students was essentially the most seen video on Fb in 2018.
Jay Shetty/Fb, CC BY
All up Shetty reportedly earned US$1 million in Fb promoting income in 2018 – one thing definitely to encourage Pawluck and his collaborators.
Present me the eudaimonia!
Research point out that eudaimonic media is usually a “ethical motivator”, inspiring prosocial behaviour.
However there’s a transparent moral drawback when content material creators have excessive hedonistic motivations – fame and fortune – to make “feel-good” movies. With that strain, “acts of kindness” can turn out to be performative, even exploitative.
A part of any social media influencer’s technique is a type of efficiency, after all. However with a “eudaimonic” content material creator, it’s exhausting to reconcile virtuous motion with contrived eventualities the place the individuals being filmed are getting used as a method to an finish.
Learn extra:
Giving out flowers on TikTok: is that this a ‘random act of kindness’ or simply benevolent ageism?
We’re all accountable
It will be simple to give attention to Pawluck and his fellow content material creators, however that is a part of the larger systemic drawback with social media: that it’s typically delinquent even when showing, superficially, to be prosocial.
The underside line with your entire social media enterprise mannequin is that interesting to, amplifying and manipulating feelings is a surefire solution to improve engagement and monetise content material.
That is the place all of us, as social media customers, have the facility to contribute to the upper good. We should be extra discerning about the kind of content material we’re encouraging individuals like Pawluck to make although our clicks and feedback.
Learn extra:
What our adverse feedback and shopper gripes on social media reveal about us
Watching that video might need momentarily made us really feel good, however did the content material creator really do good? Are they upfront about their monetary motivations? Have they sought permission from their unwitting topics?
As Maree famous after she unwittingly grew to become the star of the newest commercially-motivated social media development:
I really feel like clickbait.
Contemplate the impression of your subsequent hit of a feel-good video of a rescued canine or giving these much less lucky cash or meals. Is that this a eudaimonic or money-making second?
Learn extra:
Social media regulation: why we should guarantee it’s democratic and inclusive
Renee Barnes doesn’t work for, seek the advice of, personal shares in or obtain funding from any firm or group that will profit from this text, and has disclosed no related affiliations past their tutorial appointment.
